4.6 Article

Galantamine maintains ability to perform activities of daily living in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 52, Issue 7, Pages 1070-1076

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52303.x

Keywords

activities of daily living; galantamine; Alzheimer's disease

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [U19 AG010483] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of galantamine on activities of daily living (ADLs) with respect to baseline dementia severity, correlation with cognitive and global function, specific ADLs affected, and maintenance of ADL independence. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a 5-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Multiple U.S. clinical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred fifty-nine patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) who completed 5 months of treatment. INTERVENTION: Galantamine at a maintenance dose of 16 or 24 mg/d. MEASUREMENTS: The AD Cooperative Study ADL Inventory (ADCS/ADL). RESULTS: Galantamine resulted in more improvement in ADCS/ADL scores than placebo regardless of baseline dementia severity, with the greatest differences occurring in patients with more severe disease. Changes in ADCS/ADL scores correlated significantly with change scores on the cognitive subscale of the AD Assessment Scale (r=-0.24). Galantamine treatment resulted in maintenance or improvement of basic and instrumental ADLs, and change from baseline to Month 5 in scores for each individual ADL item favored galantamine over placebo in three of six basic ADLs and six of 17 instrumental ADLs. CONCLUSION: Galantamine has a favorable effect on ADL performance in patients with AD, detectable after 5 months of treatment, regardless of dementia severity. The ADCS/ADL appears to better measure distinct abilities that may be relevant not only in clinical trials but also in individual patients than do cognitive assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available