4.6 Article

Star formation activity of intermediate redshift cluster galaxies out to the infall regions

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 421, Issue 1, Pages 59-70

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041222

Keywords

galaxies : clusters : individual : RX J094330.7+164002; galaxies : clusters : individual : RX J094344.9+164448; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : distances and redshifts; galaxies : stellar content

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a spectroscopic analysis of two galaxy clusters at z approximate to 0.2, out to similar to4 Mpc. The two clusters VMF73 and VMF74 as identified by Vikhlinin et al. (1998) were observed with multiple object spectroscopy using MOSCA at the Calar Alto 3.5 m telescope. Both clusters lie in the ROSAT Position Sensitive Proportional Counter field 8285 and were selected from the X-ray Dark Cluster Survey (Gilbank et al. 2004) that provides optical V- and I-band data. VMF73 and VMF74 are located at respective redshifts of z = 0.25 and z = 0.18 with velocity dispersions of 671 km s(-1) and 442 km s(-1), respectively. Both cluster velocity dispersions are consistent with Gaussians. The spectroscopic observations reach out to similar to2.5 virial radii. Line strength measurements of the emission lines Halpha and [O II]lambda3727 are used to assess the star formation activity of cluster galaxies which show radial and density dependences. The mean and median of both line strength distributions as well as the fraction of star forming galaxies increase with increasing clustercentric distance and decreasing local galaxy density. Except for two galaxies with strong Halpha and [O II] emission, all of the cluster galaxies are normal star forming or passive galaxies. Our results are consistent with other studies that show the truncation in star formation occurs far from the cluster centre.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available