4.4 Article

Evidence for subdivision of the root-endophyte Phialocephala fortinii into cryptic species and recombination within species

Journal

FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 7, Pages 676-687

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2004.03.004

Keywords

Phialocephala fortinii; root-endophyte; cryptic species; recombination; gene flow; genotype flow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genetic structure of the root-endophyte Phialocephala fortinii was analyzed in three study sites using I I single-copy RFLP probes. A total of 541 strains isolated from surface-sterilized, fine roots (diameter 0.5-3 mm) of Norway spruce (Picea abies) were examined. The average gene diversity (H) was high in all three study sites. Cluster analysis showed that up to four well-separated clusters of multi-locus haplotypes were present within the sites. Significant population subdivision was detected among these clusters, suggesting that groups of multi-locus haplotypes were reproductively isolated and that P. fortinii is a species complex composed of several cryptic species. This hypothesis was supported by ISSR-PCR which showed clusters consistent with those of the multi-locus haplotypes identified by RFLP analysis. In contrast, ITS sequence analysis did not allow to separate the species as clearly. The index of association (I-A) did not deviate significantly from zero within any cryptic species, suggesting that recombination occurs within these species. Cryptic species occurred sympatrically. Thalli of two cryptic species were detected in the same 5-mm-long root segment in one instance. No significant differentiation was observed among populations of the same cryptic species in forest stands located approximately 5 km from each other. This finding is consistent with significant gene flow over this spatial scale. In addition, several isolates with both identical multi-locus haplotype and identical ISSR fingerprint were found at each study site indicating genotype flow or a recent common history between study sites. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available