4.7 Article

Cyclical Cushing syndrome presenting in infancy: An early form of primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease, or a new entity?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 89, Issue 7, Pages 3173-3182

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-032247

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cushing syndrome is uncommon in childhood and rare in infancy. We report the case of a 3-yr-old child who presented with symptoms of Cushing syndrome beginning shortly after birth. Her hypercortisolemia was cyclical, causing relapsing and remitting symptoms, which eventually led to suspicions of possible Munchausen syndrome by proxy. Investigation at the National Institutes of Health excluded exogenous administration of glucocorticoids and indicated ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome. Paradoxical response to dexamethasone stimulation (Liddle's test) suggested a diagnosis of primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease (PPNAD). After bilateral adrenalectomy, both glands showed micronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia, but histology was not consistent with typical PPNAD. DNA analysis of the coding sequences of the PRKAR1A gene (associated with PPNAD and Carney complex) and the GNAS gene (associated with McCune-Albright syndrome) showed no mutations. We conclude that hypercortisolemia in infancy may be caused by micronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia, which can be cyclical and confused with exogenous Cushing syndrome. A paradoxical rise of glucocorticoid excretion during Liddle's test may delineate these patients. Infantile micronodular disease has some features of PPNAD and may represent its early form; however, at least in the case of the patient reported here, micronodular hyperplasia was not caused by coding mutations of the PRKAR1A or GNAS genes or associated with typical histology or any other features of Carney complex or McCune-Albright syndrome and may represent a distinct entity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available