4.4 Article

The propionyl cation heat of formation revisited

Journal

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 39, Issue 7, Pages 802-807

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jms.654

Keywords

propionyl cation; methylketene; photoionization; proton affinity; heat of formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 298 K heat of formation for the propionyl cation (C2H5CO+) has been measured previously by dissociative photoionization mass spectrometry. However, recent theoretical and experimental studies involving methylketene suggest that this may be significantly underestimated, resulting in a methylketene proton affinity that is too high by similar to30 kJ mol(-1). In this study, the previous m/z 57 appearance energies were carefully re-evaluated, with various possible sources of error being investigated. These include factors such as sample purity, carbon-13 contamination from lower energy m/z 56 processes, kinetic and/or competitive shifts, reverse activation energies, ionizing energy calibration errors and the availability of accurate supplementary thermochemical data. In addition, high-level ab initio calculations are used to model the relevant unimolecular fragmentation processes for each of the ionized precursor molecules. As a result, it is found that only the 2-butanone appearance energy can be used to provide a reliable value for the propionyl cation heat of formation. From the 298 K m/z 57 appearance energy of 10.199 +/- 0.003 eV for 2-butanone measured here, a value of 617.8 +/- 0.9 kJ mol(-1) is derived for DeltaHdegrees(f,298)(C2H5CO+), which corresponds to 845.4 +/- 4.8 kJ mol(-1) for the proton affinity of methylketene. This is in good agreement with previous theoretical calculations and thermokinetic proton affinity measurements, indicating that a significant upward revision to the propionyl cation heat of formation is warranted. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available