4.6 Article

Alternative approach to assessment of bone quality using micro-computed tomography

Journal

BONE
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 326-333

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.02.019

Keywords

micro-computed tomography; two-dimensional analysis; three-dimensional analysis; rat tibia; cancellous bone structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) allows for classical anatomical imaging well suited to the study of skeletal structures. Recent improvements in spatial resolution and the ability to assess cancellous bone microstructure more efficiently has led to an increase in the number of micro-CT users in both academic and commercial environments. Accurate and reproducible positioning of bone samples and image acquisition time are two limiting factors that every bio-imaging laboratory must deal with. Therefore, method improvements that may save time or improve quality and reproducibility of data are always welcome. Here, we present an alternative approach for performing two- (21)) and three-dimensional (31)) analysis of bone tissue using in vitro micro-CT technology. The proposed method for acquiring longitudinal images of long bones has several advantages over the conventional scanning method of generating axial images. The proposed method allows for more accurate and reproducible positioning of specimen for single and multi-sample scans while providing higher-resolution image sets in substantially less time, compared to the conventional method. In addition, longitudinal images generated with the proposed method are comparable to views obtained by classic bone histology and, thus, are more informative to bone scientists, providing an opportunity to assess cancellous bone of the metaphysis and/or epiphysis, evaluate longitudinal bone growth, and finally to more accurately and reproducibly define regions of interest on image. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available