4.5 Article

Molecular pathogenesis of cystinosis:: effect of CTNS mutations on the transport activity and subcellular localization of cystinosin

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 13, Issue 13, Pages 1361-1371

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddh152

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cystinosis is an inherited disorder characterized by defective lysosomal efflux of cystine. Three clinical forms (infantile, juvenile and ocular cystinosis) have been described according to the age of onset and severity of the symptoms. The causative gene, CTNS, encodes a seven transmembrane domain protein, cystinosin, which we recently identified as a H+-driven cystine transporter using an in vitro transport assay. In this study, we explored the relationship between transport activity and intracellular localization of cystinosin mutants and their associated clinical phenotype. Thirty-one pathogenic mutations (24 missense mutations, seven in-frame deletions or insertions) were analysed. Most of the mutations did not alter the lysosomal localization of cystinosin, although three partially mislocalized the protein independently of its C-terminal sorting motif, thus confirming the presence of an additional sorting mechanism. Sixteen of 19 mutations associated with infantile cystinosis abolished transport, whereas three of five mutations associated with juvenile or ocular forms strongly reduced transport, in agreement with the milder clinical phenotype. Five atypical, unclassified or misclassified mutations could be clarified using the transport data and additional genetic information. Overall, our data demonstrate that, excluding premature termination of cystinosin, impaired transport is the most frequent cause of pathogenicity, with infantile cystinosis generally resulting from a total loss of activity. Thus the transport assay could be used as a prognostic tool when novel mutations are identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available