4.7 Article

Pb(II) removal from aqueous solution by a low-cost adsorbent dry desulfurization slag

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 314, Issue -, Pages 129-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.154

Keywords

Lead removal; Low-cost adsorbent; Dry desulfurization slag; Isotherm; Kinetics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund Project of China [51102047]
  2. Fujian Provincial Science and Technology Department [2011Y0037]
  3. Fujian Provincial Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [2012J06011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A collectable and non-sintered material prepared as hollow cylindrical shaped pellet from dry desulfurization slag (FGD ash) and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) for wastewater treatments is tested. The characteristic results of powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and infrared absorption spectroscopy (IR) show that -OH, CO32-, SO32- and SO42- are the possible functional groups responsible for Pb uptake. Adsorption data indicate that Pb removal is pH dependent and optimal at pH 6, with a very rapid initial removal that reaches equilibrium in about 90 mm. A maximum removal of 99.2% is seen for 5 mg/L (pH of 6); higher initial Pb concentrations reduce overall removal efficiencies, but generate higher surface loadings. Adsorption process correlates well with both Langmuir and Freundlich models, although the Langmuir isotherm is more favored, providing a maximum adsorption capacity (Qm) of 130.2 mg/g (13 wt%). Pseudo-second order rate kinetic model best describes the Pb removal, and calculated RI, values between 0 and 1, indicate a favored adsorption process that is chemisorption limited. SEM and EDAX analysis of the surface and fracture surface show that Pb occurs as surface precipitates and that Pb is not distributed to the inner core of the pellet. This study demonstrates that dry FGD ash could be successfully used for wastewater Pb removal. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available