4.6 Article

A modified medium that significantly improves the growth of human normal ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells in vitro

Journal

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
Volume 84, Issue 7, Pages 923-931

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700093

Keywords

bovine pituitary extract; cloning efficiency; ovarian surface epithelium; population doubling; tissue culture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Approximately 90% of malignant ovarian tumours are epithelial and thought to arise from a single cell layer, the ovarian surface epithelium. In culture, human normal ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells have a very limited lifespan before they senesce, rarely progressing beyond 10 population doublings. This has restricted the use of normal OSE cells for studying the biology of ovarian surface epithelium and identifying molecular events that contribute to malignant transformation. We have investigated the conditions for culturing human, normal OSE cells in vitro using modified media. Culturing normal OSE cells in a modified medium (NOSE-CM) supplemented with epidermal growth factor, hydrocortisone, insulin and bovine pituitary extract led to significant improvements in the seeding and cloning efficiencies, overall cell growth and lifespan compared to culturing in a basic, nonsupplemented medium (Ill and previously used media (F-12K medium and William's medium E). Cells cultured in NOSE-CM underwent, on an average, 19.0 population doublings (95% CI 16.3-21.7); cells cultured in BM underwent 0.43-3.52 population doublings over a similar time period. Growth curves established for different lines indicated that OSE cells continued to grow beyond passage 11 and up to passage 18 in NOSE-CM, but never beyond passage 7 when cultured in BM. It is likely that establishing optimal conditions for the growth of OSE cells in vitro will enable studies of the biological and genetic mechanisms of transformation in epithelial ovarian cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available