4.7 Article

Enhancement of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies following vaccination with CEA peptide-pulsed dendritic cells

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 53, Issue 7, Pages 609-616

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-003-0491-7

Keywords

DC; CEA; HLA-A24; CTL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is strongly expressed in a vast majority of gastrointestinal carcinomas. Recently, epitope peptides of CEA were identified. We have demonstrated HLA-A24-restricted peptide, CEA652[9] (TYACFVSNL), was capable of eliciting specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) which could lyse tumor cells expressing HLA-A24 and CEA. HLA-A24 is the most applicable MHC class I allele in the Japanese population. In this pilot study, we have used the peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs) generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4 as the source of the vaccine. Eight patients with advanced CEA-expressing gastrointestinal malignancies received subcutaneous injections every 2 or 3 weeks. Immunomonitoring was performed by ELISpot (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot) assay to measure the precursor frequency of CTLs and their capacity to elicit antitumor CTLs in vitro. Four of seven patients have developed their CTL response after vaccinations. DTH reaction was observed in one of eight patients at the DC-injected site. Skin biopsy at the injected site showed the infiltration of the lymphocytes. Furthermore, A24/CEA peptide tetramer assay revealed an increase in peptide-specific T-cell precursor frequency in vaccinated patients. No significant toxic adverse effects were observed, except for mild diarrhea in one case after three vaccinations. Three patients have shown stabilization of the disease after vaccinations. In conclusion, our results clearly demonstrated that our vaccination protocol was safe and might develop a CEA-specific CTL response in cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available