4.7 Article

Mechanisms maintaining sympatric distributions of two ladyfish (Elopidae: Elops) morphs in the Gulf of Mexico and western North Atlantic Ocean

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 1173-1181

Publisher

AMER SOC LIMNOLOGY OCEANOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2004.49.4.1173

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two morphs of ladyfish exist in the western North Atlantic and adjacent waters: Elops saurus, a high-count morph (79-87 myomeres or vertebrae) in the north, and Elops sp., a low-count morph (73-78 myomeres or vertebrae) in the south. It has been proposed that these morphs are two allopatric species, but significant questions about their ecology remain. We examined 4,597 specimens and found that E. saurus was distributed principally in the western North Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico, whereas Elops sp. was distributed principally in the Caribbean Sea. Mixing of both morphs occurred along the east coast of the United States and the gulf coast of Mexico. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that these meristic differences arise from latitudinal differences in temperature between spawning areas (i.e., Jordan's rule). Dispersal via the Gulf Stream System and associated mesoscale features appear sufficient to explain all areas of sympatric distribution. Elops larvae were found nearly year-round in Florida estuaries, but E. saurus larvae were dominant in winter and spring collections, and Elops sp. larvae were dominant in summer and autumn. Thus, juvenile Elops sp. experience a shorter growing season and a different suite of estuarine conditions than juvenile E. saurus. The low initial abundance and high mortality of Elops sp. reduce the potential for interbreeding with E. saurus where they are sympatric. Such ecological data uphold the postulation that the two morphs are different species and support the existence of macroscale biotic connectivity between the Caribbean region and North America.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available