4.7 Article

Deciphering regulatory patterns of inflammatory gene expression from interleukin-1-stimulated human endothelial cells

Journal

ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1192-1198

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000131263.06296.77

Keywords

endothelial cells; inflammation; interleukin-1; microarrays; transcription factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective - Endothelial cells comprise a key component of the inflammatory response. We set out to obtain a comprehensive overview of the immediate-early to early gene expression program of interleukin-1 (IL-1)-stimulated endothelial cells and to identify novel transcription factors and regulatory elements. Methods and Results - Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were stimulated with IL-1 for 0, 0.5, 1, 2.5, and 6 hours and analyzed using Affymetrix U133 microarrays. A total of 137 genes were found to be regulated >4-fold, including 18 transcription factors. The expression of selected genes was confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cluster analysis was performed in order to group genes according to their expression profiles. To identify novel transcription factor - binding sites, the corresponding promoters were extracted from databases and analyzed for regulatory elements that were over-represented in specific clusters. Several potentially novel DNA binding sites were identified, and one was shown to specifically bind an IL-1-inducible protein from HUVEC. Conclusions - These results demonstrate that in the early phase after stimulation, IL-1 evokes a complex gene expression program that includes positive but also negative (feedback) regulators of diverse endothelial cell functions. Furthermore, the identification of a new promoter regulatory element demonstrates the feasibility of the bioinformatics-driven approach to discover novel regulatory mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available