4.7 Article

Spatial variation of the X-ray spectrum of the Crab Nebula

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 609, Issue 1, Pages 186-193

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/421011

Keywords

ISM : individual (Crab Nebula); supernova remnants; X-rays : ISM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a spectral analysis of the Crab Nebula obtained with the Chandra X-ray observatory. The X-ray spectrum is characterized by a power law whose index varies across the nebula. The variation can be discussed in terms of the particle injection from the pulsar in two different directions: the equatorial plane containing the torus and the symmetry axis along the jet. In the equatorial plane, spectra within the torus are the hardest, with a photon index alpha approximate to 1.9, and are almost independent of the surface brightness. At the periphery of the torus, the spectrum gradually softens in the outer, lower surface brightness regions, up to alpha approximate to 3.0. This indicates that synchrotron losses become significant to X-ray-emitting particles at the outer boundary of the torus. We discuss the nature of the torus, incorporating information from observations at other wavelengths. Spectral variations are also seen within the southern jet. The core of the jet is the hardest, with alpha approximate to 2: 0, and the outer sheath surrounding the core becomes softer with alpha up to 2.5 at the outermost part. Based on the similarity between the spectra of the jet core and the torus, we suggest that the electron spectra of the particles injected from the pulsar are also similar in these two different directions. The brightness ratio between the near and far sides of the torus can be explained by Doppler boosting and relativistic aberration; however, the observed ratio cannot be derived from the standard weakly magnetized pulsar wind model. We also found a site where an optical filament comprising supernova ejecta is absorbing the soft X-ray emission (< 2 keV).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available