4.4 Article

Biocontrol of psychrotrophic enterotoxigenic Bacillus cereus in a nonfat hard cheese by an enterococcal strain-producing enterocin AS-48

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
Volume 67, Issue 7, Pages 1517-1521

Publisher

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-67.7.1517

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacillus cereus is a food poisoning bacterium of great concern, especially in milk products. In this study, we describe the efficient control of the psychrotrophic and toxigenic strain B. cereus LWL1 in milk and in a nonfat hard cow's cheese by the enterocin AS-48 producer strain Enterococcus faecalis A-48-32 (Bac(+)). No viable B. cereus cells were detected after 72 It incubation in milk coinoculated with the AS-48-producing strain and B. cereus. Diarrheic toxin production was also markedly inhibited by the Bac(+) strain to eightfold lower levels compared with control cultures of B. cereus. In cheeses manufactured by inoculation with a commercial starter (about 6.8 log CFU/ml) and B. cereus (about 4 log CFU/ml), the latter reached 6.27 log CFU/g after 5 days of maturation, and approximately 8 log CFU/g after 15 days. However, in cheeses made from milk inoculated with the starter along with a mixture of E. faecalis-B. cereus (2/1 ratio), counts of B. cereus decreased by approximately 1.0, 2.0, 4.32, and 5.6 log units with respect to control cheeses after 5, 10, 15, and 30 days of ripening, respectively. Growth of E. faecalis A-48-32 was associated with enterocin AS-48 production and persistence in cheese. Interestingly, growth of starter cultures was not affected by the Bac(+) strain, and neither was lactic acid production. These results clearly indicate that E. faecalis A-48-32 produced satisfactory amounts of bacteriocin in cheese and support the potential use of AS-48-producing strains as culture adjuncts to inhibit B. cereus during cheese manufacture and ripening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available