4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Behavioral and physiologic responses to caloric restriction in mice

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 81, Issue 5, Pages 749-754

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.025

Keywords

obesity; radiotelemetry; caloric restriction; calorimetry

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-56732] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of the review is to highlight the influences of ambient temperature (T-a) and caloric restriction (CR) on metabolism, cardiovascular function and behavior in mice. Standard vivarium ambient temperatures (T-a congruent to 23 degreesC) are a mild cold stress for mice requiring elevated metabolic rate and food intake. Increasing T-a into the zone of thermoneutrality (TMN congruent to 29-33 degreesC) markedly reduces food intake, metabolic rate, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure in mice. Mice are members of a diverse, yet unique group of homeothermic animals that respond to thermal and energetic challenges by allowing body temperature (T-b) to fall to less than 31 degreesC, a condition known as torpor. In mice housed at standard T-a, torpor is induced by a single night of fasting or a few days of CR. The mechanisms responsible for initiating torpor are related to reduced caloric availability, but do not require leptin. Mice housed at TMN and subjected to CR exhibit physiologic reductions in metabolic rate and HR, but do not appear to enter torpor. Finally, mice exhibit differential locomotor activity responses during CR that depends on T-a. At standard T-a, mice display increased light-phase home-cage activity with CR. This response is virtually eliminated when CR is performed at TMN. We suggest that researchers using mice to investigate energy homeostasis and cardiovascular physiology carefully consider the influence of T-a on physiology and behavior. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available