4.0 Article

Carbon storage in labile fractions of soil organic matter in a tropical no-tillage Oxisol

Journal

PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA
Volume 39, Issue 7, Pages 677-683

Publisher

EMPRESA BRASIL PESQ AGROPEC
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2004000700009

Keywords

tropical soils; greenhouse effect; conservative agriculture; soil management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon storage in the soil organic matter (SOM) is an important strategy to mitigate carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the no-tillage (NT) use for six years, under four autumn (dry-season) cover crops based maize and soybean crop rotations (pigeon pea-pearl millet, bengan hemp-sorghum, sunflower-black oat, and wild radish-maize), on C storage in the particulate (>53 mum) and mineral-associated (<53 mum) SOM fractions of a clayey Oxisol from Brazilian Cerrado region. In comparison to conventional tillage (CT) under summer cash-crops, NT increased the total organic carbon (TOC) stocks in the surface soil layer (0-5 cm). In the top 20 cm layer, NT soil under wild radish-maize had 9% (4.66 Mg ha(-1)) more TOC than the conventionally tilled soil. On the other hand, C storage in NT soil under other cropping systems was statiscally similar to the CT soil. The C stocks in the particulate SOM fraction increased by 37 to 52% in NT soil (0-20 cm) in comparison to CT. The higher sensitivity to soil management changes made the particulate organic matter a more adequate soil quality index compared to the TOC stocks. The C stock in the mineral-associated SOM fraction was not affected by soil management systems, which can be related to the short-term under NT and or to the highly stable soil microaggregates in this clayey Oxisol. The preferential C storage in the labile SOM fraction is an environmental benefit, which is expected to occur only under continuous no-tillage and crop residues addition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available