4.4 Review

New vistas on amygdala networks in conditioned fear

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 1-9

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00153.2004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20-RR-015565] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [S06-GM-08236] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [P50-MH-58911, R01-MH-46516, K05-MH-067048, R01-MH-066856-01, R37-MH-38774, R01-MH-58883] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is currently believed that the acquisition of classically conditioned fear involves potentiation of conditioned thalamic inputs in the lateral amygdala ( LA). In turn, LA cells would excite more neurons in the central nucleus ( CE) that, via their projections to the brain stem and hypothalamus, evoke fear responses. However, LA neurons do not directly contact brain stem-projecting CE neurons. This is problematic because CE projections to the periaqueductal gray and pontine reticular formation are believed to generate conditioned freezing and fear-potentiated startle, respectively. Moreover, like LA, CE may receive direct thalamic inputs communicating information about the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. Finally, recent evidence suggests that the CE itself may be a critical site of plasticity. This review attempts to reconcile the current model with these observations. We suggest that potentiated LA outputs disinhibit CE projection neurons via GABAergic intercalated neurons, thereby permitting associative plasticity in CE. Thus plasticity in both LA and CE would be necessary for acquisition of conditioned fear. This revised model also accounts for inhibition of conditioned fear after extinction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available