4.6 Article

Safety of DTaP-based combined immunization in very-low-birth-weight premature infants: Frequent but mostly benign cardiorespiratory events

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 145, Issue 1, Pages 58-66

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.04.006

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate the safety of diphtlieria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio-Haemophilus influenzae type B (DTaP-IPV-HIB) immunization in premature infants. Study design Observational study of 78 very low birth weight premature infants (mean gestational age, 28 +/- 2 weeks; mean birth weight, 1045 +/- 357 g) given DTaP-IPV-HIB vaccine before hospital discharge. Apnea, bradycardia, oxygen requirements and saturation, feeding practice, and medical interventions were assessed before and after immunization. The results were analyzed by the severity of the clinical condition and the persistence of prematurity-associated symptoms. Results Administration of DTaP-IPV-HIB elicited resurgence or increase in cardiorespiraton, events in 47% of infants (15% had apnea, 21% had bradycardia, 42% of desaturations). Most vaccine-triggered events resolved spontaneously or after brief stimulation. The relative risk was 5- to 8-fold higher in infants with a severe clinical course or persistence of cardiorespiratory symptoms at the time of immunization. Bag-mask respiratory support was given to 5 of 78 infants, and O-2 requirements increased transiently in 4 of 21 infants with chronic lung disease, none requiring reventilation. Reintroduction Of O-2 supplementation, interruption of active oral feeding, or postponing of hospital discharge was not required. Conclusions Cardiorespiratory events were frequently increased after DTaP-IPV-HIB immunization, requiring monitoring and appropriate intervention. However, these episodes did not have detrimental impact on the infants' clinical course. Timely immunization is warranted even in the most vulnerable preterm infants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available