4.6 Article

Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages 721-730

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh032

Keywords

aging; atrophy; calcarine cortex; cortical thickness; dementia; executive function; magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; prefrontal cortex

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR14075, P41RR14075] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG05681, AG03991, AG05886] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS39581] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thickness of the cerebral cortex was measured in 106 non-demented participants ranging in age from 18 to 93 years. For each participant, multiple acquisitions of structural T-1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were averaged to yield high-resolution, high-contrast data sets. Cortical thickness was estimated as the distance between the gray/white boundary and the outer cortical surface, resulting in a continuous estimate across the cortical mantle. Global thinning was apparent by middle age. Men and women showed a similar degree of global thinning, and did not differ in mean thickness in the younger or older groups. Age-associated differences were widespread but demonstrated a patchwork of regional atrophy and sparing. Examination of subsets of the data from independent samples produced highly similar age-associated patterns of atrophy, suggesting that the specific anatomic patterns within the maps were reliable. Certain results, including prominent atrophy of prefrontal cortex and relative sparing of temporal and parahippocampal cortex, converged with previous findings. Other results were unexpected, such as the finding of prominent atrophy in frontal cortex near primary motor cortex and calcarine cortex near primary visual cortex. These findings demonstrate that cortical thinning occurs by middle age and spans widespread cortical regions that include primary as well as association cortex.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available