4.7 Article

Morphology and wettability of ZnO nanostructures prepared by hydrothermal method on various buffer layers

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 286, Issue -, Pages 391-396

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.098

Keywords

Zinc oxide (ZnO); Hydrothermal method; Buffer layer; Nanostructure; Wettability

Funding

  1. Young's Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu University [JDQ03008]
  2. Senior Talent Research Foundation of Jiangsu University [13JDG045]
  3. National Key Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB013000]
  4. Jiangsu Province Research Innovation Program of College Graduate [CXZZ13_0663]
  5. Open Research Fund Program of Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Center for Photon Manufacturing Science and Technology
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructures were prepared by hydrothermal method on glass substrates with various buffer layers: Ag, Al, aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) and tin-doped indium oxide (ITO). The structure, morphology and wettability of the ZnO nanostructured surfaces were investigated by using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and water contact angle (WCA) analysis methods, respectively. All the nanostructures grown on glass with various buffer layers exhibited strong growth orientation along the (1 0 1) plane. The nature of the buffer layer was found to have remarkable effect on the morphology and wettability of the ZnO nanostructures. Whether the buffer layers were hydrophilic or low hydrophobic, all the ZnO nanostructures grown on the various buffer layers showed high hydrophobic property, and that grown on the AZO buffer layer even exhibited superhydrophobicity with a WCA of 151.1 degrees. This work may provide a scientific basis for self-cleaning ZnO-based optoelectronic device applications. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available