4.6 Article

Abundant expression, of granzyme A, burt not perforin, in granules of CD8+ T cells in GALT:: Implications for immune control of HIV-1 infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 173, Issue 1, Pages 641-648

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.641

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR 00083-41] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI 057020, R21 AI 054235, P30 AI 27763] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because GALT is a major portal of entry for HIV-1 and reservoir for viral replication, we hypothesized that an ineffective cellular immune response in intestinal mucosa might partially explain the failure of immune control in AIDS. In this study, we demonstrate that the vast majority of CD8(+) T cells in rectal tissue, including HIV-1-specific cells, fail to express the cytolytic protein, perforin. However, rectal CD8(+) T cells do express granzyme A, and are also capable of releasing IFN-gamma upon stimulation with cognate peptide. Confocal microscopy showed that granzyme A was located in intracellular granules in the absence of perforin. The majority of rectal CD8(+) T cells exhibit an effector memory phenotype, expressing CD45RO but not CCR7. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that perforin RNA is expressed in rectal CD8(+) T cells from healthy and HIV-1-positive individuals. In HIV-1-positive individuals, similar amounts of perforin RNA were detected in CD8(+) T cells from rectal tissue and PBMC, despite a relative absence of perforin protein in rectal tissue. These findings demonstrate an important difference in perforin expression between CD8(+) T cells in blood and mucosa. Furthermore, the relative absence of armed effector cells may serve to protect the integrity of rectal mucosa under normal conditions, but might also provide an early advantage to HIV-1 and other sexually transmitted viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available