4.4 Article

Kidney function after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

Journal

UROLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 43-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.039

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To evaluate the function of the remaining kidney after nephrectomy for renal cell cancer by technetium-99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (Tc-99m-MAG3) renal scintigraphy. Methods. We evaluated 30 consecutive patients who were undergoing unilateral radical nephrectomy by Tc-99m-MAG3 scintigraphy. All patients underwent three consecutive 99mTc-MAG3 scintigraphy studies. The first study was performed before nephrectomy, the second 1 month after surgery, and the third 1 year after surgery. At these times, the serum creatinine levels were also evaluated. Results. The mean preoperative MAG3 clearance of the remaining kidney of the 30 patients was 155.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The mean MAG3 clearance of the remaining kidney had increased to 209.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) by I month after nephrectomy, and the average percentage increase was 39.5%. After 1 year, it had increased to 211.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2), with a 40.5% average percentage increase. The preoperative MAG3 clearance of the remaining kidney was inversely correlated with the percentage of increase in MAG3 clearance of the remaining kidney. Abnormal serum creatinine levels (greater than 1.3 mg/dL) were more common after nephrectomy, occurring in 6 patients at 1 month and in 5 patients at 1 year postoperatively. In all 6 patients with elevated creatinine levels, the preoperative MAG3 clearance of the remaining kidney was less than 150 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Conclusions. Adaptive hyperfunction occurs soon after nephrectomy that is not associated with age or sex and continues for at least 1 year. A greater compensatory response is produced in patients with more severe renal deterioration. Using (99)mTc-MAG3 scintigraphy, we may be able to predict postoperative renal function. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available