Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 28-35Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.03.022
Keywords
abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter; axial computed tomography; duplex ultrasound; three-dimensional aneurysm reconstruction; orthogonal aneurysm measurements
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective(s). Clinical assessment Of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter assumes clinical equivalency between ultrasound (US) and axial computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction allows for the assessment of AAA in the orthogonal plane and avoids oblique cuts due to AAA angulation. This study was undertaken to compare maximal AAA diameter by US, axial CT, and orthogonal CT, and to assess the effect that AAA angulation has on each measurement. Methods. Maximal AAA diameter by US (USmax), axial CT (axial(max)), and orthogonal CT (orthogonal(max)) along with aortic angulation and minor axis diameters were measured prospectively. Spiral CT data was processed by Medical Media Systems (West Lebanon, NH) to produce computerized axial CT and reformatted orthogonal CT images. The US technologists were blinded to all CT results and vice versa. Results. Thirty-eight patients were analyzed. Mean axial(max) (58.0 mm) was significantly larger (P < 0.05) than USmax (53.9 mm) or orthogonal(max) (54.7 mm). The difference between USmax and orthogonal(max) (0.8 min) was insignificant (P > 0.05). When aortic angulation was : less than or equal to25degrees, axial(max) (55.3 mm), USmax (54.3 mm), and orthogonal(max) (54.1 mm) were similar (P > 0.05); however, when aortic angulation was >25degrees, axial(max) (60.1 mm) was significantly larger (P < 0.001) than USmax (53.8 mm) and orthogonal(max) (55.0 mm). The limits of agreement (LOA) between axial(max) and both USmax and orthogonal(max) was poor and exceeded clinical acceptability (+/- 5 mm). The variation between USmax and orthogonal(max) was minimal with an acceptable LOA of - 2.7 to 4.5 mm. Conclusion. Compared to axial CT, US is a better approximation of true perpendicular AAA diameter as determined by orthogonal CT When aortic angulation is greater than 25degrees axial CT becomes unreliable. However, US measurements are not affected by angulation and agree strongly with orthogonal CT measurements.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available