4.7 Article

Influence of different buffer gases on synthesis of few-layered graphene by arc discharge method

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 258, Issue 10, Pages 4523-4531

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.019

Keywords

Graphene; Arc discharge; Buffer gas; Hydrophobility; Field emission

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. National Nature Science Foundations of China [51005225, 51002161]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Few-layered graphene sheets were synthesized by direct current arc discharge using different buffer gases. The samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and four-probe method. Moreover, the hydrophobility and the field emission properties of the sprayed-coating graphene films prepared by a direct solution process were studied. As a result, the generation of graphene sheets shows strong dependence on the composition of buffer gases and containing H-2 buffer gases are necessary to prepare few-layered graphene sheets. The graphene sheets produced in H-2-He buffer gases have better crystallinity and higher specific surface area compared with those produced in others containing H-2 buffer gases. The as-obtained graphene sheets are mainly no more than 5 layers and their lateral dimensions are about 40-200 nm. The graphene sheets show excellent thermal stability and there is only less than 3 wt.% weight loss up to 800 degrees C in N-2 atmosphere. The graphene sheets can be easily dispersed into ethanol and the as-obtained suspension can be stable for more than two months. The sprayed graphene films show good hydrophobility and a typical cold cathode field emission behavior. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available