4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Malignant disease and cardiovascular morbidity in hypopituitary adults with or without growth hormone replacement therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 89, Issue 7, Pages 3306-3312

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-031601

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A retrospective comparison was performed between 1411 hypopituitary adults without GH replacement [mean age, 56.9 (SD 18.6) yr] and the normal population in terms of fatal and nonfatal morbidity. A similar prospective comparison was then made in 289 hypopituitary patients on long-term GH replacement [mean age, 47.6 (SD 14.8) yr; mean duration of GH treatment, 60 months]. In the 1411 hypopituitary patients without GH replacement, overall mortality (P < 0.001), and the rates of myocardial infarctions (P < 0.01), cerebrovascular events (P < 0.001), and malignancies (P < 0.001) were increased compared with the normal population. Colorectal cancer was the most common malignancy in this cohort (P < 0.001 vs. the background population). In the 289 hypopituitary patients on GH replacement, overall mortality and the rate of malignancies were similar to the normal population. In the hypopituitary adults on GH therapy, the rate of myocardial infarctions was lower than that in the background population (P < 0.05), and there was a tendency toward an increased rate of cerebrovascular events. In conclusion, overall mortality and the rate of myocardial infarctions were increased in hypopituitary patients without GH replacement. An increased rate of malignancies was observed in the hypopituitary adults without GH therapy, with a predominance of colorectal cancer. GH replacement appeared to provide protection from myocardial infarctions. The rate of cerebrovascular events tended to be increased also in hypopituitary adults on GH therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available