4.7 Article

Study on microwave absorbing properties of carbonyl-iron composite coating based on PVC and Al sheet

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 258, Issue 15, Pages 5746-5752

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.02.082

Keywords

Coating; Microwave absorption; PVC-based; Carbonyl-iron particle; Bruggeman's equation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51007005]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090041120038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To suppress the increasingly terrible electromagnetic pollution, microwave absorption coatings based on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sheet have been fabricated, employing polyurethane varnish (PU) as matrix and carbonyl-iron particle (CIP) as absorbent. The morphology, static magnetic and microwave absorption properties of CIP were characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) and vector network analyzer (VNA), respectively. Bruggeman's equation was introduced to calculate the electromagnetic parameters of materials in the frequency range of 2-18 GHz and the loss mechanisms were discussed. Furthermore, the microwave absorption properties of composite coatings with different component content and thickness were investigated. The results show that the electromagnetic properties of the composite heavily depended on the particle loadings. The minimum reflection peaks of the coatings shift towards the lower frequency region with the increase of CIP content or coating thickness. PVC-based coatings with a component content of 1:7 (PU:CIP mass ratio) in CIP/PU layer, exhibit a minimum reflection loss value of -29 dB at 4 GHz and a permissible reflection loss (RL <= -10 dB) frequency band of 2-6 GHz, which is much better than the performance of the common metal-based coatings in the lower frequency. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available