4.6 Article

Monomeric IgG in intravenous Ig preparations is a functional antagonist of FcγRII and FcγRIIIb

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 173, Issue 1, Pages 332-339

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.332

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intravenous Ig preparations (IVIg), originally developed as a substitution therapy for patients with low plasma IgG, are nowadays frequently used in the treatment of various immune diseases. However, the mechanism of action of IVIg in these diseases remains elusive and is often referred to as immunomodulatory. We hypothesized that monomeric IgG may act as a low-affinity FcgammaR antagonist and sought experimental evidence for this hypothesis. Human neutrophils as well FcgammaRIIa-transfected IIA1.6 cells were used as FcgammaR-positive cells and aggregated IgG (aIgG) or stable dimeric IgG as FcgammaR-specific agonists for these cells. We found that monomeric IgG purified from IVIg at concentrations similar to that of IgG in plasma, diminished the binding of stable dimeric IgG to FcgammaRIIa transfectants, reduced aIgG-induced influx of Ca2+ ions into the cytosol of neutrophils, and attenuated the aIgG-induced release of elastase. Notably, monomeric IgG by itself did not elicit these responses, nor did it affect these processes in response to fMLP. Absorption of IgG from normal plasma revealed that plasma IgG exerted similar effects as monomeric IgG in IVIg. In addition, adding monomeric IgG to blood of healthy volunteers showed a dose-dependent decrease of aIgG-induced elastase release. Finally, we observed decreased aIgG-induced polymorphonuclear neutrophil responses in two hypogammaglobulinemic patients upon treatment with IVIg. We conclude that monomeric IgG at physiological levels acts as a low-affinity FcgammaR antagonist. Moreover, FcgammaR antagonism constitutes an immunomodulatory effect of IVIg.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available