4.6 Article

Alterations of adenylyl cyclase and G proteins in aortocaval shunt-induced heart failure

Journal

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00798.2003

Keywords

G(s) and G(i) proteins; cardiac hypertrophy; volume overload

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unlike most other experimental models of congestive heart failure, the volume overload model induced by aortocaval shunt (AVS) in rats was found to exhibit enhanced beta-adrenoceptor (beta-AR) signaling. To study whether the adenylyl cyclase (AC)-G protein system is involved in such a change, we examined cardiac AC activity and protein content as well as G(s)alpha and G(i)alpha activities, protein contents, and mRNA levels in both left (LV) and right (RV) ventricles at the failing stage (16 wk after surgery). Basal and forskolin-stimulated AC activities were significantly increased in both LV and RV from the failing hearts; this change was associated with an upregulation of type V/VI AC protein. In contrast to 5'-guanylyl imidodiphosphate and NaF, the stimulatory effect of isoproterenol on AC was increased in the failing heart. Although G(s)alpha and G(i)alpha protein contents in the failing hearts were not altered, the mRNA level for G(s)alpha was decreased by 20% and that for G(i)alpha was increased by 20%. In addition, the activity of G(s)alpha, but not G(i)alpha, as assessed by toxin-catalyzed ADP ribosylation, was significantly decreased in the failing heart. Losartan and imidapril treatments improved cardiac function and attenuated alterations in mRNA levels for G(s)alpha and G(i)alpha proteins, as well as Gs(alpha) activity, without affecting changes in AC protein content or activities in heart failure due to volume overload. These data suggest that increased AC activity may contribute to the enhanced beta-AR signaling in the AVS model of heart failure, whereas alterations in gene expression for G proteins may be of an adaptive nature at this stage of heart failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available