4.6 Article

Prevalence, risk factors and cardiovascular comorbidity of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in Italy

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 175, Issue 1, Pages 131-138

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.03.009

Keywords

peripheral arterial disease; epidemiology; risk factors; cardiovascular comorbidity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The epidemiology of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been studied almost exclusively in northern European and northern American populations. We report the first survey in Italy to describe the prevalence of symptomatic PAD and clinical correlates. From the lists of seven general practitioners, all subjects aged 40-80 years (n = 4352) received a Rose Questionnaire (RQ). In those reporting pain in the lea while walking. which did not disappear while continuing to walk (n = 760), Doppler examination was performed. PAD was defined by ankle/brachial index < 0.90, or reduced flow velocity. The prevalence of symptomatic PAD was 1.6% (2.4% in men, 0.9% in women). Foreach PAD patient. three controls matched for sex and age were randomly selected. At the multivariate analysis, smoking, diabetes and hypertension were significantly associated with PAD. A coexistent cardiovascular disease was found in 34% of patients and 11% of controls (P < 0.001). Only PAD was shown to be independently associated with a previous cardiovascular event. Although symptomatic, 45% of the patients were unaware of their condition. In conclusion, prevalence and cardiovascular comorbidity of symptomatic PAD in Italy seem to be lower than in other western countries. The finding that PAD was unrecognised in about 50% of affected individuals implies that a large proportion of PAD population is not given preventive therapy, so remaining at high cardiovascular risk. Thus, there is need to alert general practitioners to this topic. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available