4.5 Article

Methyl malondialdehyde is not suitable as an internal standard for malondialdehyde detection in urine after derivatisation with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.03.053

Keywords

derivatisation; LC; methyl malondialdehyde; 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A previously described method of measurement of malondialdehyde (MDA) in human urine after derivatisation with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) was tested for a possibility of using methyl malondialdehyde (MeMDA) as an internal standard. Despite structural similarity, those compounds were found to produce different yields of derivatisation under the same conditions depending on urine matrix. We conclude, that MeMDA is not suitable as an internal standard for the measurement of MDA in urine under previously reported conditions when DNPH is used as a deriviatising agent. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available