4.8 Article

Microviscometry reveals reduced blood viscosity and altered shear rate and shear stress profiles in microvessels after hemodilution

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0402937101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL076499, HL64381] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008715, T32GM 08715-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We show that many salient hemodynamic flow properties, which have been difficult or impossible to assess in microvessels in vivo, can be estimated by using microviscometry and fluorescent microparticle image velocimetry in microvessels >20 mum in diameter. Radial distributions in blood viscosity, shear stress, and shear rate are obtained and used to predict axial pressure gradient, apparent viscosity, and endothelial-cell surface-layer thickness in vivo. Based solely on microparticle image velocimetry data, which are readily obtainable during the course of most intravital microscopy protocols from systemically injected particle tracers, we show that the microviscometric method consistently predicted a reduction in local and apparent blood viscosity after isovolemic hemodilution. Among its clinical applications, hemodilution is a procedure that is used to treat various pathologies that require reduction in peripheral vascular-flow resistance. Our results are directly relevant in this context because they suggest that the fractional decrease in systemic hematocrit is approximate to25-35% greater than the accompanying fractional decrease in microvascular-flow resistance in vivo. In terms of its fundamental usefulness, the microviscometric method provides a comprehensive quantitative analysis of microvascular hemodynamics that has applications in broad areas of medicine and physiology and is particularly relevant to quantitative studies of angiogenesis, tumor growth, leukocyte adhesion, vascular-flow resistance, tissue perfusion, and endothelial-cell mechanotransduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available