4.7 Article

Drug-induced atrioventricular block: Prognosis after discontinuation of the culprit drug

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 105-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.057

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to determine how often atrioventricular (AV) block is really caused by medications. BACKGROUND Beta-blockers, verapamil, and diltiazem, are considered a cause of AV block for which pacemaker implantation is not indicated. However, it is not known if such patients can expect a benign course after discontinuation of the culprit medication. METHODS Consecutive patients with 11 or III degree AV block not related to acute myocardial infarction, digitalis toxicity, or vasovagal syncope were studied. The level of AV block (AV-nodal or infranodal) was defined by electrocardiographic criteria. The cause and effect relation between AV block and drugs was defined according to the response to drug discontinuation. RESULTS Of 169 patients with AV block, 92 (54%) were receiving beta-blockers and/or verapamil or diltiazem. Patients receiving medications had similar clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics with patients who had AV block in the absence of drugs. Drug discontinuation was followed by resolution of AV block in 41% of cases, whereas spontaneous improvement of AV conduction occurred in 23% of patients who had AV block in the absence of drugs. However, 56% of the patients for whom drug discontinuation led to resolution of AV block had recurrence of AV block in the absence of therapy. Atrioventricular block that was truly caused by drugs was found in only 15% of patients who had 11 or III degree AV block during therapy with beta-blockers, verapamil, or diltiazem. CONCLUSIONS Atrioventricular block is commonly related to drugs but is rarely caused by drugs. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available