4.7 Article

Fast and slow voltage-dependent dynamics of magnesium block in the NMDA receptor: The asymmetric trapping block model

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 27, Pages 6171-6180

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1380-04.2004

Keywords

magnesium; open-channel block; synaptic integration; nucleated patch; kinetics; rat cortex

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The NMDA receptor ( NMDAR) produces a long-lasting component of the glutamatergic EPSC in mammalian central neurons. The current through NMDARs is voltage dependent as a result of block by extracellular magnesium, which has recently been shown to give rise to a complex time dependence, with fast and slow components of responses to changes in membrane potential. Here, we studied the dynamics of block and unblock by measuring voltage step responses in conjunction with fast perfusion of agonist in nucleated patches isolated from rat cortical pyramidal neurons. We found that slow unblock shows a progressive onset during synaptic-like responses to brief pulses of agonist. Repolarizing briefly from +40 to -70mV revealed that slow unblock is reestablished with a time constant of similar to5 msec at room temperature. Also, the time course of deactivation, in response to a pulse of agonist, slows twofold over the potential range -30 to +40 mV. An asymmetric trapping block model in which the voltage-independent closing rate constant of the blocked channel is approximately three times that of the unblocked channel accounts quantitatively for all of these phenomena and for responses to action potential waveform clamp. This model allows much more accurate prediction of NMDAR current in physiological conditions of magnesium concentration and changing membrane potential than previously possible. It suggests a positive allosteric link between occupation of the NMDAR pore by magnesium and closure of the permeation gate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available