4.8 Article

Histone deacetylase inhibitors activate INK4d gene through Sp1 site in its promoter

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 23, Issue 31, Pages 5340-5349

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207689

Keywords

histone deacetylase inhibitors; p19(INK4d); Sp1; Sp3; HDAC2; promoter activation

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA71907, CA 21765] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are known to arrest human tumor cells at the G1 phase of the cell cycle and activate the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21(WAF1/Cip1). However, several studies have suggested the existence of a p21(WAF1/Cip1)-independent molecular pathway. We report here that HDAC inhibitors activate a member of the INK4 family, the INK4d gene, causing G1 phase arrest, in the human T cell leukemia cell line, Jurkat. One of the major Trichostatin A (TSA)-responsive elements is a specific Sp1 binding site in the INK4d promoter. Electrophoretic mobility-shift assay revealed that Sp1 and Sp3 can specifically interact with this Sp1 binding site. Furthermore, using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, we demonstrated that HDAC2 was present in the INK4d proximal promoter region in the absence, but not the presence, of TSA. Taken together, these results suggest that treatment with TSA transcriptionally activates INK4d by releasing HDAC2 from the histone-DNA complex at the INK4d promoter. Using a p21(WAF1/Cip1)-deleted human colorectal carcinoma cell line, HCT116 p21 (-/-), we show that upregulation of p19(INK4d) by TSA is associated with inhibition of cell proliferation. Moreover, mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking Ink4d were resistant to the growth inhibitory effects of TSA as compared to their wild-type counterpart. Our findings suggest that p19(INK4d) in addition to p21(WAF1/Cip1) is an important molecular target of HDAC inhibitors inducing growth arrest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available