4.7 Article

Comparison of self-cleaning properties of three titania coatings on float glass

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 258, Issue 3, Pages 1126-1131

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.09.048

Keywords

Titania; Glass; Self-cleaning; Photocatalytic; Hydrophilic

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Graduate School of Materials Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work compares the self-cleaning properties of experimental TiO2 and TiO2-Ag coatings on float glass with a commercial self-cleaning glass. In the experimental surfaces, TiO2 coating was applied to float glass via the sol-gel route, while TiO2-Ag coating was applied by the liquid flame spray method, which deposits TiO2-Ag composite nanoparticles on the surface. The effect of the coatings on the surface wettability and the activation time for achieving hydrophilicity was studied through water contact angle as a function of exposure time to UV light. The surface morphology was investigated by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal optical microscopy. The photocatalytic activity of the coatings was examined with methylene blue and stearic acid degradation tests. Finally, the soil attachment to the surfaces was tested with a sebum-based model soil. The sol-gel TiO2 coating became superhydrophilic within a few hours, while the activation time needed for the commercial titania coated glass was several days. The surface with the TiO2-Ag nanoparticles did not show any marked changes in the water contact angle. The commercial titania coated and the sol-gel TiO2 surfaces showed self-cleaning properties and clearly lower attachment of soil than the uncoated and TiO2-Ag coated surfaces. The difference in the interaction of the surfaces with the organic contaminants was assumed to depend mainly on differences in the thickness of the coatings. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available