4.6 Article

High density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk of stroke in elderly men

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 2, Pages 150-157

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh177

Keywords

aged; cerebrovascular accident; lipoproteins; HDL cholesterol; men

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HC-05102, U01-HL-56274] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [N01-AG-4-2149] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol has been inversely associated with coronary heart disease. Associations with stroke are less clear, particularly among the elderly. In this study, the authors examined the relation between HDL cholesterol levels and the risk of stroke in elderly men. Levels of HDL cholesterol were measured in 2,444 Honolulu Heart Program men aged 71-93 years at the 1991-1993 examinations. The participants, who were free of prevalent stroke, coronary heart disease, and cancer at baseline, were followed to the end of 1998 for thromboembolic and hemorrhagic stroke. While HDL cholesterol was unrelated to hemorrhagic events, incidence of thromboembolic stroke declined consistently with increasing HDL cholesterol level (p=0.003). There was a nearly threefold excess of thromboembolic stroke in men with low HDL cholesterol levels (<1.0 mmol/liter (<40 mg/dl)) compared with men with high levels (greater than or equal to1.6 mmol/liter (greater than or equal to60 mg/dl)) (10.6/1,000 person-years vs. 3.6/1,000 person-years; p=0.001). Adjustment for other risk actors had little effect on these findings, although associations appeared strongest in elderly men with desirable total cholesterol levels, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus. These findings suggest that HDL cholesterol level is inversely related to the risk of thromboembolic stroke in elderly men. Whether HDL cholesterol alters the effect of other factors on stroke risk in elderly men warrants further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available