4.6 Article

An advanced intercross line resolves Eae18 into two narrow quantitative trait loci syntenic to multiple sclerosis candidate loci

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 173, Issue 2, Pages 1366-1373

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.2.1366

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identification of polymorphic genes regulating inflammatory diseases may unravel crucial pathogenic mechanisms. Initial steps to map such genes using linkage analysis in F, intercross or backcross populations, however, result in broad quantitative trait loci (QTLs) containing hundreds of genes. In this study, an advanced intercross-line in combination with congenic strains, was used to fine-map Eae18 on rat chromosome 10 in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-induced EAE is a chronic relapsing disease that closely mimics key features of multiple sclerosis. Congenic DA.ACI rat strains localized Eae18 to an similar to30-Mb large region. Fine-mapping was then performed in an advanced intercross line consisting of a (DA X PVG.1AV1)F-7 intercross, resulting in two adjacent EAE-regulating QTLs designated Eae18a and Eae18b. The two QTLs span 5.5 and 3 Mb, respectively, and the 3-Mb Eae18b contains as few as 10 genes, including a cluster of chemokine genes (CCL1, CCL2, CCL7, and CCL11). Eae18a and Eae18b are syntenic to human chromosome 17p13 and 17q11, respectively, which both display linkage to multiple sclerosis. Thus, Eae18 consists of at least two EAE-regulating genes, providing additional evidence that clustering of disease-regulating genes in QTLs is an important phenomenon. The overlap between Eae18a and Eae18b with previously identified QTLs in humans and mice further supports the notion that susceptibility alleles in inflammatory disease are evolutionary conserved between species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available