4.7 Article

Thickness dependent activity of nanostructured TiO2/α-Fe2O3 photocatalyst thin films

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 257, Issue 5, Pages 1724-1728

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.09.005

Keywords

Nanograins; Iron oxide; Titania; Thin films; Photoinactivation; Antibacterial property

Funding

  1. Research Council of Sharif University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of thickness of TiO2 coating on synergistic photocatalytic activity of TiO2 (anatase)/alpha-Fe2O3/glass thin films as photocatalysts for degradation of Escherichia coli bacteria in a low-concentration H2O2 solution and under visible light irradiation was investigated. Nanograined alpha-Fe2O3 films with optical band-gap of 2.06 eV were fabricated by post-annealing of thermal evaporated iron oxide thin films at 400 degrees C in air. Increase in thickness of the Fe2O3 thin film (here, up to 200 nm) resulted in a slight reduction of the optical band-gap energy and an increase in the photoinactivation of the bacteria. Sol-gel TiO2 coatings were deposited on the alpha-Fe2O3 (200 nm)/glass films, and then, they were annealed at 400 degrees C in air for crystallization of the TiO2 and formation of TiO2/Fe2O3 heterojunction. For the TiO2 coatings with thicknesses <= 50 nm, the antibacterial activity of the TiO2/alpha-Fe2O3 (200 nm) was found to be better than the activity of the bare alpha-Fe2O3 film. The optimum thickness of the TiO2 coating was found to be 10 nm, resulting in about 70 and 250% improvement in visible light photo-induced antibacterial activity of the TiO2/alpha-Fe2O3 thin film as compared to the corresponding activity of the bare alpha-Fe2O3 and TiO2 thin films, respectively. The improvement in the photoinactivation of bacteria on surface of TiO2/alpha-Fe2O3 was assigned to formation of Ti-O-Fe bond at the interface. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available