4.6 Article

IκB kinase α and p65/Re1A contribute to optimal epidermal growth factor-induced c-fos gene expression independent of IκBα degradation

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 279, Issue 30, Pages 31183-31189

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M404380200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA73756] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI35098] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitogenic activation of expression of immediate-early genes, such as c-fos, is controlled through signal-induced phosphorylation of constitutively bound transcription factors that is correlated with a nucleosomal response that involves inducible chromatin modifications, such as histone phosphorylation and acetylation. Here we have explored a potential role for the transcription factor NF-kappaB and its associated signaling components in mediating induction of c-fos gene expression downstream of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-dependent signaling. Here we show that EGF treatment of quiescent fibroblast does not induce the classical pathway of NF-kappaB activation through IkappaB kinase (IKK)-directed IkappaBalpha phosphorylation. Interestingly, efficient induction of c-fos transcription requires IKKalpha, one of the subunits of the IkappaB kinase complex. The NF-kappaB subunit, p65/RelA, is found constitutively associated with the c-fos promoter, and knock-out of this transcription factor significantly reduces c-fos gene expression. Importantly, EGF induces the recruitment of IKKalpha to the c-fos promoter to regulate promoter-specific histone H3 Ser(10) phosphorylation in a manner that is independent of p65/RelA. Collectively, our data demonstrate that IKKalpha and p65/RelA contribute significantly to EGF-induced c-fos gene expression in a manner independent of the classical, IkappaBalpha degradation, p65/RelA nuclear accumulation response pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available