4.7 Article

Metal and metalloid concentrations in the eggs of threatened Florida scrub-jays in suburban habitat from south-central Florida

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 328, Issue 1-3, Pages 185-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.01.030

Keywords

Florida scrub-jay; metals; metalloids; temporal trends; lead; mercury; cadmium; selenium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monitoring and assessing changes in contaminants in urban and suburban environments is essential to assessing ecosystem well-being in human-influenced landscapes. We analyzed metal and metalloid levels in the eggs of the threatened Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), an extremely sedentary and modestly long-lived passerine bird that is federally threatened and endemic only in Florida. Eggs that failed to hatch were collected in a suburban environment to compare with the long-term study of this species at the Archbold Biological Station, located 8 km south in a more rural part of south-central Florida. Florida scrub-jays remain in a permanent territory in scrub oak habitat where they feed mainly on insects and acorns, but in suburban habitats human-provided foods comprise 30% of their diet. From the data previously collected at Archbold, and their low position on the food chain, we expected levels of contaminants to be comparatively low and remain relatively constant over time. Except for the low mercury value, all means were within the range of mean values reported for a wide range of non-passerine species (including those at higher tropic levels), are lower than concentrations associated with abnormalities in birds, and are lower than those previously reported for scrub-jays from Archbold Biological Station. A significant increase in selenium occurred from 1996 to 2001, but did not appear associated with changes in human density. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available