4.2 Article

The effect of fusafungine on post-operative pain and wound heating after pediatric tonsillectomy

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.03.008

Keywords

tonsillectomy; pain; wound heating; fusafungine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the effect of fusafungine spray on pain and heating process after pediatric tonsillectomy. Methods: Sixty children with ages between 4 and 14 years underwent tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy. The patients were randomly divided into three groups and each group consisted of 20 patients. Group 1 was treated with antibiotic (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) plus analgesic (acetaminophen), group 2 was treated with fusafungine plus analgesic (acetaminophen) and group 3 was treated with only fusafungine. The average ages were 7.8 + 3.4, 6.6 + 2.9, and 8.2 + 3.7 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Clinical. evaluations were made after the operation on the 1st (T1), 3rd (T3), 7th (T7), 10th (T10), and 14th days (T14). Results: There was no significant difference in post-operative pain between study groups on the post-operative 1st, 3rd, and 7th days (P > 0.05), a statistically significant difference was present between groups 1 and 3, and groups I and 2 on the post-operative 10th and 14th day (P = 0.018 and 0.037, respectively). Pain was less in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1 on the 10th and 14th day. Also there was a significant difference in heating time of the tonsillary beds between groups 1 and 2, and groups 1 and 3 on the 10th and 14th post-operative day (P = 0.031 and 0.001, respectively). Heating was better in groups 2 and 3 than in group 1 on the 10th and 14th day. Conclusion: Fusafungine administration after tonsillectomy was found to be beneficial on post-operative pain and wound heating of tonsillary beds in pediatric population. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available