4.5 Article

Vitamin E reduces amyloidosis and improves cognitive function in Tg2576 mice following repetitive concussive brain injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 758-764

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02560.x

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amyloidosis; head trauma; oxidative stress; vitamin E

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL69835] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG11542] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 34690] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [NS08803, NS40978] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traumatic brain injury is a well-recognized environmental risk factor for developing Alzheimer's disease. Repetitive concussive brain injury (RCBI) exacerbates brain lipid peroxidation, accelerates amyloid (Abeta) formation and deposition, as well as cognitive impairments in Tg2576 mice. This study evaluated the effects of vitamin E on these four parameters in Tg2576 mice following RCBI. Eleven-month-old mice were randomized to receive either regular chow or chow-supplemented with vitamin E for 4 weeks, and subjected to RCBI (two injuries, 24 h apart) using a modified controlled cortical impact model of closed head injury. The same dietary regimens were maintained up to 8 weeks post-injury, when the animals were killed for biochemical and immunohistochemical analyses after behavioral evaluation. Vitamin E-treated animals showed a significant increase in brain vitamin E levels and a significant decrease in brain lipid peroxidation levels. After RBCI, compared with the group on regular chow, animals receiving vitamin E did not show the increase in Abeta peptides, and had a significant attenuation of learning deficits. This study suggests that the exacerbation of brain oxidative stress following RCBI plays a mechanistic role in accelerating Abeta accumulation and behavioral impairments in the Tg2576 mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available