4.1 Article

Potency and stability of frozen urokinase solutions in syringes

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY
Volume 61, Issue 15, Pages 1586-1589

Publisher

AMER SOC HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/61.15.1586

Keywords

color; concentration; dilutions; freezing; hydrogen ion concentration; injections; precipitation; stability; storage; thawing; thrombolytic agents; urokinase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. The stability and potency of frozen urokinase solutions in syringes were studied. Methods. To determine the stability and potency of compounded urokinase dilutions after multiple freeze-thaw cycles, a total of 160 syringes containing five urokinase concentrations (2,500, 5,000, 7,500, 12,500, and 25,000 IU/mL) were prepared. For each of the five concentrations tested, two syringes per concentration were reserved for baseline testing. The remaining 150 syringes were frozen at -30degreesC. After 7 days, half of the syringes (group 1) were thawed at room temperature, tested, and left at room temperature for 12 hours before refreezing. The other half of the syringes (group 2) were kept frozen for 30 days. Thirty days after initial compounding, all syringes were thawed, and the samples' urokinase potency, pH, and physical appearance were evaluated. Syringes were visually inspected for color, clarity, and precipitation. Descriptive statistics were computed for each concentration group and testing day. Results. The compounded dilutions were stable under each experimental condition, with no physical deterioration or loss of in vitro potency after two freeze-thaw cycles. The reduced waste associated with the ability to refreeze unused urokinase could substantially lower the cost of procedures such as thrombolysis after intraventricular hemorrhage and catheter clearance by as much as 95%. Conclusion. Dilutions of urokinase 2,50025,000 IU/mL were stable in single-use syringes after being frozen for 7 days, thawed, and refrozen for another 23 days.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available