4.7 Article

Summertime variation of methane oxidation in the rhizosphere of a Carex dominated freshwater marsh

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 38, Issue 25, Pages 4165-4173

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.022

Keywords

Carex marsh; methane concentration; methane emission; methane oxidation; summertime variation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To understand the summertime variation pattern of CH4 oxidation in the rhizosphere, CH4 oxidation was evaluated in a freshwater marsh vegetated with Carex lasiocarpa and Carex meyeriana in the Sanjiang plain of northeast China at the three growing stages. Two methods through covering plants with a black cloth and applying acetylene to inhibit CH4 oxidation were used to quantify CH4 oxidation rates in the field. CH4 fluxes and CH4, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and CO2 concentrations in porewater in the freshwater marsh were determined before and after the plants were covered or acetylene was applied. Temperature and redox potential in the vertical profile as well as aboveground and underground plant biomass were measured as well. Due to CH4 oxidation, CH4 concentrations in porewater in the C. lasiocarpa and C. meyeriana marsh were reduced by 2.1-18.2% and 0.7-25.8%, and the fluxes of potential CH4 emissions were lowered by 3.2-35.9% and 4.3-38.5%, respectively. The highest CH4 oxidation rate occurred in June, up to 30.1-38.5% of the potential CH4 fluxes, whereas the correspondent value was only 3.2-15.8% in July and August. CH4 oxidation rates in the Carex marsh decreased with increasing temperature in the vertical profile over the growing season. This is due likely to more O-2 released from the roots in porewater to be consumed by other aerobic microbes in the rhizosphere at high temperature, resulting in the decrease of the CH4 oxidation rate. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available