4.3 Article

Free energy surfaces of β-hairpin and α-helical peptides generated by replica exchange molecular dynamics with the AGBNP implicit solvent model

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 310-321

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20104

Keywords

replica exchange method; beta-hairpin; alpha-helix; implict solvent model; potential of mean force

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-30580] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have studied the potential of mean force of two peptides, one known to adopt a beta-hairpin and the other an alpha-helical conformation in solution. These peptides are, respectively, residues 41-56 of the C-terminus (GEWTYDDATKTFTVTE) of the B1 domain of protein G and the 13 residue C-peptide (KETAAAKFERQHM) of ribonuclease A. Extensive canonical ensemble sampling has been performed using a parallel replica exchange method. The effective potential employed in this work consists of the OPLS all-atom force field (OPLS-AA) and an analytical generalized Born (AGB) implicit solvent model including a novel nonpolar solvation free energy estimator (NP). An additional dielectric screening parameter has been incorporated into the AGBNP model. In the case of the beta-hairpin, the nonpolar solvation free energy estimator provides the necessary effective interactions for the collapse of the hydrophobic core (W43, Y45, F52, and V54), which the more commonly used surface-area-dependent nonpolar model does not provide. For both the beta-hairpin and the a-helix, increased dielectric screening reduces the stability of incorrectly formed salt bridges, which tend to disrupt the formation of the hairpin and helix, respectively. The fraction of beta-hairpin and alpha-helix content we obtained using the AGBNP model agrees well with experimental results. The thermodynamic stability of the beta-hairpin from protein G and the alpha-helical C-peptide from ribonuclease A as modeled with the OPLS-AA/ AGBNP effective potential reflects the balance between the nonpolar effective potential terms, which drive compaction, and the polar and hydrogen bonding terms, which promote secondary structure formation. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available