4.3 Article

A 14-year prospective study of autonomic nerve function in Type 1 diabetic patients:: association with nephropathy

Journal

DIABETIC MEDICINE
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 852-858

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01255.x

Keywords

autonomic neuropathy; nephropathy; neuropathy; proliferative; retinopathy; retinopathy; symptoms of neuropathy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Prospective studies of autonomic nerve function are rare. We have followed the progression of autonomic dysfunction in relation to nephropathy over 14 years in Type 1 diabetic patients. Methods Autonomic nerve function was assessed by heart-rate responses to deep breathing (E/I ratio) and tilting (acceleration and brake indices) and by the postural blood pressure reaction in 58 patients, 43 of whom were reassessed after 14 years. Nephropathy was evaluated by the degree of albuminuria (albuminuria > 20 mug/min or > 0.03 g/24 h) and glomerular filtration rate (Cr-51-EDTA plasma clearance). The acceleration index had deteriorated after 7 years (P = 0.0155), whereas the E/I ratio (P = 0.0070) and the diastolic postural blood pressure reaction (P = 0.0054) had deteriorated 14 years after the baseline examination (age-corrected values). All those with albuminuria at the third examination showed signs of autonomic neuropathy at baseline (10 of 10) compared with only nine of 22 without (P = 0.0016). Multiple regression analysis showed that the association between autonomic dysfunction and future albuminuria was due to the E/I ratio. In addition, individuals with an abnormal postural diastolic blood pressure fall (n = 7) at baseline showed a greater fall in glomerular filtration rate more than others 7-14 years later [29 (16.5) ml/min/1.72 m(2) vs. 11 (9) ml/min/1.72 m(2); P = 0.0074]. Conclusion Autonomic nerve function had deteriorated after 14 years. Autonomic neuropathy and abnormal postural diastolic blood pressure falls at baseline were associated with future renal complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available