4.2 Article

Thiopurine drug adverse effects in a population of New Zealand patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Journal

PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 563-567

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pds.926

Keywords

inflammatory bowel disease; azathioprine; 6-mercaptopurine; drug toxicity; thiopurine drugs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The thiopurine drugs, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are effective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, their use is limited by serious adverse effects that can lead to cessation of therapy. The incidence of these adverse effects has been reported to be approximately 9% but in Christchurch it was felt that the incidence was higher. Methods We searched our letter database to identify all patients with IBD who had received a thiopurine drug between 1996 and 2002. The case notes were then reviewed to identify those patients who had suffered an adverse effect that required cessation of the drug. Results From a total of 216 patients with IBD taking a thiopurine drug, 56 (25.9%) had an adverse reaction requiring cessation of the drug. Adverse effects included allergic-type (25%), liver test abnormalities (34%), nausea/vomiting (6%), bone marrow suppression (7%), pancreatitis (7%) and other (9%). Males were significantly more likely than females to have an allergic-type reaction (p = 0.003). All adverse effects resolved with cessation of the drug, with a median of 7 days to resolution. Of the patients with liver test abnormalities on azathioprine, most were able to tolerate 6-mercaptopurine, however challenge with 6-mercaptopurine was not successful for most other patients. Conclusions In Canterbury, New Zealand, patients with IBD have a high rate of therapy-limiting adverse effects to thiopurine drugs. There is significant gender bias for allergic-type adverse effects. Mechanisms for both these observations are not clear. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available