4.4 Article

Urinary excretion of purine derivatives as an index of microbial protein synthesis in the camel (Camelus dromedarius)

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 92, Issue 2, Pages 225-232

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1079/BJN20041208

Keywords

purine derivatives; xanthine oxidase; microbial protein; camels

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Five experiments were carried out to extend knowledge of purine metabolism in the camel (Camelus dromedarius) and to establish a model to enable microbial protein outflow from the forestomachs to be estimated from the urinary excretion of purine derivatives (PD; i.e. xanthine, hypoxanthine, uric acid, allantoin). In experiment 1, four camels were fasted for five consecutive days to enable endogenous PD excretion in urine to be determined. Total PD excretion decreased during the fasting period to 267 (SE 41.5) mumol/kg body weight (W)(075) per d. Allantoin and xanthine + hypoxanthine were consistently 86 and 6.1% of total urinary PD during this period but uric acid increased from 3.6% to 7.4%. Xanthine oxidase activity in tissues (experiment 2) was (mumol/min per g fresh tissue) 0038 in liver and 0005 in gut mucosa but was not detected in plasma. In experiment 3, the duodenal supply of yeast containing exogenous purines produced a linear increase in urinary PD excretion rate with the slope indicating that 0.63 was excreted in urine. After taking account of endogenous PD excretion, the relationship can be used to predict purine outflow from the rumen. From the latter prediction, and also the purine:protein ratio in bacteria determined in experiment 5, we predicted the net microbial outflow from the rumen. In experiment 4, with increasing food intake, the rate of PD excretion in the urine increased linearly by about 11-1 mmol PD/kg digestible organic matter intake (DOMI), equivalent to 95 g microbial protein/kg DOMI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available