4.4 Article

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with use of an implanted port system in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Prognostic factors

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 835-841

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000128815.35555.0E

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: This study was retrospectively undertaken to identify prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with a percutaneously implantable port system inserted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight patients underwent arterial infusion chemotherapy for portal venous invasion (n = 39), severe liver dysfunction (n = 6), or tumor regrowth after chemoembolization, percutaneous ethanol injection therapy, and surgery (n = 77). Twenty-five variables representing patients' characteristics, previous treatments, tumor characteristics, liver profiles, various staging systems, and therapeutic effect were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 55% and 24%, respectively, with a mean survival period of 19.5 months +/- 1.9 in all patients. Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score, Okuda stage, therapeutic effect, tumor extension, alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase levels, ascites, and portal venous invasion were identified as significant prognostic factors by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified CLIP score, Okuda stage, and therapeutic effect as significant independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Although our results should be confirmed in future prospective studies, the prognostic factors identified in the present study should prove helpful in classifying patients with advanced HCC who are treated by arterial infusion chemotherapy and should serve as useful guidelines on arterial infusion chemotherapy in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available