4.7 Article

Visual recovery following acute optic neuritis - A clinical, electrophysiological and magnetic resonance imaging study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 251, Issue 8, Pages 996-1005

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-004-0477-1

Keywords

optic neuritis; multiple sclerosis; magnetic resonance imaging; gadolinium; visual evoked potentials

Funding

  1. Multiple Sclerosis Society [748] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with acute optic neuritis examined with serial visual tests, visual evoked potentials (VEPs), conventional and triple-dose gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to examine which factors are important in visual recovery. Thirty-three patients were recruited with acute unilateral optic neuritis. A clinical and VEP assessment was performed on each. Optic nerve MRI was performed using fast spin echo (FSE) (on all) and triple-dose Gd-enhanced T(1)-weighted sequences (n=28). Optic nerve lesion lengths were measured. Serial assessments were performed on 22 of the patients up to one-year. Serial Gd-enhanced optic nerve imaging was performed on 15 of the patients until enhancement ceased. The final 30-2 Humphrey visual field mean deviation (MD) was 2.55 dB higher in patients in the lowest quartile of initial Gd-enhanced lesion length compared with the other quartiles (p<0.01) but recovery was not related to the duration of enhancement. The initial recovery of Humphrey MD was 4.60 dB units per day in patients with good eventual recoveries (MD>-6.0 dB) and 0.99 dB per day in poor-recovery patients (p=0.02). Good-recovery patients had mean central field VEP amplitudes 2.29 muV higher during recovery than poor-recovery patients (p=0.047). The results suggest that factors which are associated with a better prognosis are: having a short acute lesion on triple-dose gadolinium enhanced imaging, higher VEP amplitudes during recovery and a steep gradient of the initial improvement in vision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available